Ahamed Ibrahim Ali v. The Commissioner
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.02.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI Ahamed Ibrahim Ali : Petitioner Vs.
1.The Commissioner, Department of Municipal Administration, Municipal Administrative Building, Santhome High Road, M.R.C.Nagar, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai - 28.
2.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, 76, Mount Road, Guindy, Chennai - 32.
3.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.
4.The Commissioner, Paramakudi Municipality, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.
5.The District Environmental Engineer, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Door No.1, Jothi Nagar, District Collectorate Post, Sakkaraikottai Village, Ramanathapuram.
6.The Joint Secretary (Swachh Bharat), Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation, 4th Floor, Dheenathayal Anthyodaya Bhavan, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi - 110 003.
7.The Director, Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation, 4th Floor, Dheenathayal Anthyodaya Bhavan, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi - 110 003.
1/3
8.Sivasundaram : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.11.2020 to conduct enquiry to the Solid Waste Management project at Urappuli Village near Thandaradevipattinam, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Muthusamy For Respondents : Mrs.J.Padmavathi Devi, Special Government Pleader for R.1 to R.3 Mr.C.Kasirajan for R.5 Mrs.L.Victoria Gowri, Assistant Solicitor General of India for R.6 & R.7 *****
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.) The petitioner has come forward to file this writ petition with the grievance that without following due procedure, a contract has been awarded in favour of the eighth respondent towards establishments of a Solid Waste Management system.
2. Though the petitioner sought for consideration of his representation by the first respondent, we find that the said respondent is not the competent authority. In such view of the matter, we are inclined to call upon the seventh respondent to look into the grievance of the petitioner.
3. Accordingly, the petitioner is given two weeks time from the date of receipt of a copy of this order to give a fresh representation to the seventh respondent and on receipt of the same, the seventh respondent is to consider and pass appropriate orders, within a further period of six weeks thereafter. In fine, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AD-II) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) 2/3
gk To 1.The Commissioner, Department of Municipal Administration, Municipal Administrative Building, Santhome High Road, M.R.C.Nagar, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai - 28.
2.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, 76, Mount Road, Guindy, Chennai - 32.
3.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.
4.The Joint Secretary (Swachh Bharat), Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation, 4th Floor, Dheenathayal Anthyodaya Bhavan, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi - 110 003.
5.The Director, Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation, 4th Floor, Dheenathayal Anthyodaya Bhavan, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi - 110 003. +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-5331[F] dated 16/02/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.P.MUTHUSAMY, Advocate ( SR-5058[F] dated 15/02/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.C.KASIRAJAN, Advocate ( SR-5728[F] dated 17/02/2021 ) 15.02.2021 sss(CO) TR(24.02.2021) 3P 9C 3/3