Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/5943/2019disposed of

S.P.Sudhakar v. The Inspector Of Police

2019-04-25Honourable Mr Justice N. Seshasayee2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.04.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE Crl.O.P.[MD]No.5943 of 2019 S.P.Sudhakar : Petitioner /Vs./ 1.The Inspector of Police, Chintamanipatti Police Station, Saragampatti Takuka, Karur District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thuraiyur Police Station, Thuraiyur, Trichy.

3.N.Sangeetha : Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent No.1 & 2 to give adequate police protection to the petitioner and his parents from the respondent no.3 and her associates, by considering complainant's complaint dated 13.04.2019, within the period as stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Haja Mohideen For R-1 and R-2 : Mr.V.Neelakandan Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This petition is filed to direct the respondents to give adequate police protection to the petitioner and his parents.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

3. The petitioner working as a Teacher has strained relation with his wife and he has preferred a petition seeking dissolution of his marriage and it came to be dismissed. While this remains so, the third respondent visits the petitioner at his work place, forcibly enters and creates scenes such as pulling his shirt, etc.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the complaint preferred by the petitioner is pending. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Inasmuch as the complaint preferred by the petitioner is pending enquiry, the second respondent is directed to cause such necessary enquiry on the complaint filed by the petitioner and take such appropriate decision as may be necessary to protect the life, limb and liberty of the petitioner. It is made clear that this Court does not order granting of police protection 24 x 7 and the second respondent is left to decide on the basis of the objective assessment of the threat perception of the petitioner from time to time.

6. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) / True Copy / Sub Assistant Registrar(CS- ) sm To 1.The Inspector of Police, Chintamanipatti Police Station, Saragampatti Takuka, Karur District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thuraiyur Police Station, Thuraiyur, Trichy.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.A.HAJA MOHIDEEN, Advocate ( SR-62956[F] dated 26/04/2019 ) Crl.O.P.[MD]No.5943 of 2019 25.04.2019 ES/19.07.2019/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/