R. Palanisamy v. The Insepector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Seventh day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.19296 of 2015 1 R. PALANISAMY 2 P. MANI 3 P. NAGARAJAN 4 R. RAJENDRAN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED No.1 TO 4 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSEPECTOR OF POLICE VELAYUTHAM PALAYAM POLICE STATION, KARUR, KARUR DISTRICT.

CR. NO.400 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.DHANA LAW ASSOCIATES Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 4, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 447, 506(ii) of I.P.C., r/w. Section 3

(1) of TNPPDL Act in Crime No.400 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had demolished the compound wall of the de-facto complainant and criminally intimidated him.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

4. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side).

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Karur and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners 1, 3 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

and 4 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required and the third petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 07/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II,KARUR 2 DO THRO THE CHEIF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,KARUR DISTRICT 3 THE INSEPECTOR OF POLICE,VELAYUTHAM PALAYAM POLICE STATION,KARUR, KARUR DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.DHANA LAW ASSOCIATES Advocate SR.No.59071.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.19296 of 2015 Date :07/10/2015 AM/12.10.2015/NGM.SS/SAR-I/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/