Santhanam v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirteenth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.19388 of 2015 1 SANTHANAM 2 SAKTHIVEL ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 & 2 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THOGAMALAI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. 423/2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.V.KANNAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 and A2, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.423 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 21.09.2015 while the petitioner was purchasing a groceries in the ration shop, there was a wordy quarrel between the de-facto complainant and the petitioners, due to which, the petitioners attacked the de-facto complainant with wooden log and caused injuries. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the

learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kilithalai and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 13/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I KULITHALAI.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KARUR.

3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THOGAMALAI POLICE STATION,KARUR DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.V.KANNAN Advocate SR.No.60788

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.19388 of 2015 Date :13/10/2015 rg.16.10.2015/SK/SKN/ 2P/6C.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/