Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6094/2019disposed of

M.Balasubramani v. The Superintendent Of Police

2019-04-26Honourable Mr Justice N. Seshasayee2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.04.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE Crl.O.P.[MD]No.6094 of 2019 M.Balasubramani : Petitioner /Vs./ 1.The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent Office, Dindigul District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Saanarpatti Police Station, Dindigul District.

4.The Sub Inspector of Police, Saanarpatti Police Station, Dindigul District.

: Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner and his family members based on the petitioner's representation, dated 16.04.2019.

For Petitioner : Mr.AN.Ramanathan For Respondents : Mr.V.Neelakandan Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This petition is filed to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner and his family members based on the petitioner's representation, dated 16.04.2019.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner's son has eloped with a girl and he is said to have married her. A criminal case is also known to have been filed against him. In the meantime, the third respondent is harassing the petitioner endlessly over the same, when the petitioner has got nothing to do with the said action of his son. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that a case has been registered in Crime No.138 of 2019 for the offence under Section 366 A IPC against the petitioner's son and only to ascertain his whereabouts, the police have approached the petitioner. He added that the respondent police have neither harassed the petitioner nor intended to harass him.

5. The statement of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor is recorded. If at all the Investigating Agency requires to interrogate the petitioner for any gathering / information, the same shall be done only on summons under Section 41 A Cr.P.C., mentioning specific date and time for enquiry and also giving reasonable time for him to travel to the venue of such enquiry. The petitioner is also directed to co-operate with the enquiry. During enquiry, there shall not be harassment to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent Office, Dindigul District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Saanarpatti Police Station, Dindigul District.

4.The Sub Inspector of Police, Saanarpatti Police Station, Dindigul District. 5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.AN.RAMANATHAN, Advocate SR-63206. Crl.O.P.[MD]No.6094 of 2019 26.04.2019 CS: (11/06/2019) 2P 7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/