Krishnakumar v. Pappammal (Died) Amaravathy (Died)
CMP(MD) No.1524 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Seventeenth day of February Two Thousand Twenty PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.SUBRAMANIAN CMP(MD) No.1524 of 2020 IN SA(MD) No.96 of 2020 1 KRISHNAKUMAR 2 KRISHNA MANOHAR ... PETITIONERS/ APPELLANTS Vs PAPPAMMAL (DIED) AMARAVATHY (DIED) 1 B.PANDIAN 2 VAIRAMANI 3 RAJESHWARI 4 MAHESHWARI 5 SIKKAMMAL (THORUGH POWER AGENT P.RAMADASS) 6 RAMAMOORTHY 7 M.SELVAM 8 CHINNAYAN 9 JEYA 10 VANITHA ... RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to STAY the operation of the Judgement and decree dated 27.02.2017 in A.S.No.
15 of 2016 passed by the Subordinate Judge at Periyakulam pending disposal of this Second Appeal and thus render justice. ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.P.V.BALASUBRAMANIAM, Advocate for M/S.BFS LEGAL for the petitioner and of MR.M.C.SWAMY, Advocate for R6, while admitting the SA., the court made the following order:- This application has been filed seeking stay of operation of the judgment and decree in A.S.No.15 of 2016. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.
CMP(MD) No.1524 of 2020
2. The decree is one for declaration and injunction, no further proceedings are contemplated under the decree. The stay petition in my opinion is misconceived. Leaving it open to the petitioner to file appropriate application for injunction or suspension of the decree, this application is dismissed. sd/- 17/02/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDGE, SUB COURT, PERIAKULAM.
2 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF, PERIAKULAM.
ORDER
IN CMP(MD) No.1524 of 2020 IN SA(MD) No.96 of 2020 Date :17/02/2020 am JM/JC/SAR 1/20.02.2020/2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2