Madras High CourtWP(MD)/1969/2023disposed of

Sangeetha. P v. The Chief Educational Officer

2023-02-01Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.02.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI P.Sangeetha ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Chief Educational Officer, O/o. the Chief Educational Officer, Madurai, Madurai District.

2.The District Educational Officer, O/o. the District Educational Officer, Madurai, Madurai District.

3.The Correspondent, Jothi Dharman Assisi Hr.Sec.School, Sathankudi, Madurai District.

... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to approve the appointment of the petitioner as the B.T.Assistant

(Maths) in the 3rd respondent School with effect from the date of appointment i.e., 14.06.2021 with all monetary and service benefits within the time stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Louis For R1 and R2 : Mr.T.Amjad Khan Government Advocate

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to approve the appointment of the petitioner as the B.T.Assistant (Maths) in the 3rd respondent School with effect from the date of appointment i.e., 14.06.2021 with all monetary and service benefits.

2. The case of the petitioner is that she was appointed as B.T.Assistant (Maths) in the third respondent School in the year 2021. The third respondent School forwarded a proposal to the first respondent on 11.10.2021, seeking approval of her appointment with effect from 14.06.2021. However, till date no order has been passed. Hence, the

petitioner has filed the present writ petition.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that this Court may issue a direction to the first respondent to pass appropriate orders on the proposal forwarded by the third respondent School dated 11.10.202, within a reasonable time as fixed by this Court.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 and 2.

5. Since no adverse order is going to be passed as against the third respondent, notice to the third respondent is dispensed with.

6. Considering the limited request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, directs the first respondent to pass appropriate orders on the proposal forwarded by the third respondent School dated 11.10.202, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of

this order.

7. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

01.02.2023 NCC: Yes/No Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No akv To 1.The Chief Educational Officer, O/o. the Chief Educational Officer, Madurai, Madurai District.

2.The District Educational Officer, O/o. the District Educational Officer, Madurai, Madurai District.

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

akv 01.02.2023