Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/19586/2015allowed

Suhail v. The Insepector Of Police

2015-10-09Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Ninth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.19586 of 2015 SUHAIL ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.5 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSEPECTOR OF POLICE SATHANKULAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

CR. NO.461/2015 ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S P.T.RAMESH RAJA Advocate For Respondent : M/s.S.PRABHA, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who arrayed as A5, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offences punishable under Sections 147,148,341,294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.461 of 2015, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel the petitioner along with other accused have attacked the de facto complainant with wooden-log.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 am for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 09/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SATHANKULAM, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. 2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,THOOTHUKUDI. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSEPECTOR OF POLICE, SATHANKULAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S P.T.RAMESH RAJA Advocate SR.No.59873 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.19586 of 2015 Date :09/10/2015 PBK/SK-SKN/SAR-II 12/10/2015 ::2P-6C::

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/