Madras High CourtWP(MD)/2952/2021disposed of

Chandiran. P v. The Asst. Executive Engineer

2023-09-22Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.09.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S. SRIMATHY W.P(MD) No. 2952 of 2021:

P.Chandiran :Petitioner ..Vs..

1.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, TNEB Sellur, Madurai-2.

2. K.Ammaponnu

3. K.Arunkumar : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS, to direct the 1st respondent to provide separate electricity connection to the petitioner's house situated at Door.No.20/26 Ammaponnu Compound, Ayyanar Kovil 5th Street, Church Street, Sellur, Madurai, from the Electricity connection bearing no. 05-004-005-1024 on the basis of his representation dated 07.09.2020 within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court. 1/4

W.P(MD) No. 2954 of 2021:

K.Lakshmi :Petitioner ..Vs..

1.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, TNEB Sellur, Madurai-2.

2.K.Ammaponnu 3.K.Arunkumar : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS, to direct the 1st respondent to provide separate electricity connection to the petitioner's house situated at Door.No.20/26, Ammaponnu Compound, Ayyanar Kovil 5th Street, Church Street, Sellur, Madurai, from the Electricity connection bearing no. 05-004-005-1024 on the basis of his representation dated 07.09.2020 within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court. In both cases:

For Petitioner : Mr. M.Ponniah For R1 : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan R2 : Died For R3 : Mr.S.Moorthy 2/4

COMMON ORDER The petitioners in the writ petitions are tenants under the 3rd respondent.

2. Admittedly, there was a dispute between the petitioners and the 3rd respondent regarding the tenancy. Hence, the petitioners are seeking separate service connection in their name.

3. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that he has sent a letter to the petitioner through RPAD and it was returned that there is no such addressee.

4. Therefore, the writ petitions are dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners, if the same issue arises to the petitioners in future. 22.09.2023 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No tmg 3/4

S. SRIMATHY, J., tmg W.P(MD)Nos.2952 and 2954 of 2021 22.09.2023 4/4