← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/19622/2015ordered

Arumuga Nadar v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-10-12Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twelfth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.19622 of 2015 1 ARUMUGA NADAR 2 PETCHIMUTHU ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 & 2 Vs State Rep.by THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KULASEKARAPATTINAM POLICE STATION, TIRUCHENDUR TALUK,TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. 226/2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S S.R.ANBARASU Advocate For Respondent : Mrs.S.Prabha, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 and A2, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.226 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that on 03.10.2015 when the defacto complainant was going in his two wheeler, he was attacked by the accused in front of the house of the first petitioner.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the injured has discharged from the hospital.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchendur and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation and the second petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 12/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUCHENDUR 2 -do-thro THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,TUTICORIN DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KULASEKARAPATTINAM POLICE STATION, TIRUCHENDUR TALUK,TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S S.R.ANBARASU Advocate SR.No.60558 sm:sks-rr:SAR II:14.10.2015:2P/6c

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.19622 of 2015 Date :12/10/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/