Jencilin Ashok @ Jencilin Azor v. Th Esub Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twelfth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.19637 of 2015 1 JENCILIN ASOK @ JENCILIN AZOR 2 DAISY@ DAISY MARY ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THACKALAY POLICE STATION, THACKALY, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.
(CR. NO.886 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT For Petitioner : M/S N.S.RAMAKRISHNA DASS Advocate For Respondent : MS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as the accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.886 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that on 06.10.2015 the defacto complainant gave a complaint before the respondent police against the petitioners alleging that the accused are jointly attacked the de-facto complainant and caused injuries.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the injured has discharged from the hospital.
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Padmanabhapuram and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation and the second petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 12/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PADMANABHAPURAM.
2.DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 3.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THACKALAY POLICE STATION,THACKALY, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, 4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S N.S.RAMAKRISHNA DASS Advocate SR.No.60304
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.19637 of 2015 Date :12/10/2015 NS/AMF/SAR II/13.10.2015 : 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/