Raja @ Kalyanasundaram v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirtieth day of April Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.6495 of 2019 1 RAJA @ KALYANASUNDARAM 2 MANIVEL 3 JOTHIMANI, ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED RANK NO.1,3,2 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MUSIRI POLICE STATION, MUSIRI, TRICHY DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO. 126 OF 2019) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : Mr.K.ARUNRAJ Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC in Cr.No.126 of 2019, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2.It is the case of the prosecution that due to civil dispute between the petitioners and the defacto complainant, the petitioners abused the defacto complainant using filthy language and also assaulted him with iron rod. Thereby, the defacto complainant sustained injuries and was admitted in hospital. On the basis of the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant, the respondent police registered a case against the petitioners.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they have nothing to do with the alleged offence. 4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that injured has been discharged from the hospital. He would further submit that investigation is still pending.
5.Considering the facts and circumstances and considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital , this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Musiri on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (a)the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(b)the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m.,until further orders;
(c)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(d)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
(f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
sd/- 30/04/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, MUSIRI.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MUSIRI POLICE STATION, MUSIRI, TRICHY DISTRICT.
4 ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.
+1. CC to MR.K.ARUNRAJ Advocate SR.No.8017 PS/VR/SAR-1/06.05.2019/3P/6C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.6495 of 2019 Date :30/04/2019