Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6600/2019partly allowed

L.S.Soundarrajan, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2019-04-30Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirtieth day of April Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.6600 of 2019 1 L.S.SOUNDARRAJAN 2 L.R.SUBRAMNIAN 3 L.S.UMA MAHESWARI 4 N.R.KRITIKARANI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 TO 4 Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUPPARANKUNDRAM, MADURAI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.7 OF 2019 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR.M.AJMAL KHAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 120(B), 498(A), 406, 506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act in Crime No. 7 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the marriage between the first petitioner and the defacto complainant was solemnised on 09.12.2010 and they were blessed with one male child. It is the further case of the prosecution that the A1 had developed some illegal intimacy with A5 and started harassing the defacto complainant. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and hence he prayed for anticipatory bail.

4. The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the state would submit that investigation is pending.

5. Taking into consideration the fact and circumstances of the case and considering the allegations are levelled against the first petitioner, this Court is of the considered view that this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the first petitioner and accordingly, this petition is dismissed in respect of the first petitioner.

6. As regards the second petitioner there is no serious allegations against him, this Court is of the view that, some some indulgence can be shown to them and therefore, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioners 2 to 4.

7. Accordingly, the petitioners 2 to 4 are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Maduri on condition that the petitioners 2 to 4 shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioners 2 to 4 and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioners 2 to 4 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. [c] the petitioners 2 to 4 shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioners 2 to 4 shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners 2 to 4 in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners 2 to 4 released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 30/04/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV, MADURAI.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUPPARANKUNDRAM, MADURAI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.M.AJMAL KHAN, Advocate ( SR-7974[I] dated 30/04/2019 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.6600 of 2019 Date :30/04/2019 JM/VR/SAR 1/07.05.2019/2P/6C