← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/19856/2015allowed

Rajavel v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-10-14Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fourteenth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.19856 of 2015 1 RAJAVEL 2 KARUPPU RAJA 3 GOWTHAAM 4 SURYA 5 KARTHICK @ LOLLU ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED No. 1 to 5 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PERUGUDI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

IN CRIME NO. 328 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S S.MUNIYANDI Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 5, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 324 and 307 of I.P.C., in Crime No.328 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the accused have attacked the de-facto complainant.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and A6 was arrested and released on bail.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai and on their executing a bond https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 14/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI, MADURAI 2 DO THRO THE CHEIF JUDICIAL, MADURAI DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERUGUDI POLICE STATION,MADURAI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI +1. CC to M/S S.MUNIYANDI Advocate SR.No.61097.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.19856 of 2015 Date :14/10/2015 AM/16.10.2015/SK.SKN/SAR-I/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/