Soundirapandiyan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 10/02/2020 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD). No.2290 of 2020 Soundirapandiyan

...Petitioner/Accused No.1

Vs The State rep by The Inspector of Police, Sattur Taluk Police Station, Virudhunagar District (In Crime No.285 of 2019).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.S.T.Sasidharan Tamilkani, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.A.Robinson, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- for Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.285 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent. 2.The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 366, 506(ii) of I.P.C., r/w Section 4 of TNPHW Act, in Crime No.285 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 3.The petitioners and the victim are said to have been in illegal intimacy. The victim has since been secured. The complaint has been given not by the victim but by the mother-in-law. 4.I am of the view that arrest is not going to serve any purpose.

5. Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Sattur, Virudhunagar District, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously.

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

Sd/- 10.02.2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

rmi TO

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Sattur, Virudhunagar District.

2. Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur.

3. The Inspector of Police, Sattur Taluk Police Station, Virudhunagar District (In Crime No.285 of 2019).

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to M/s.S.T.Sasidharan Tamilkani, Advocate Sr.No.2760

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.2290 of 2020 Date : 10/02/2020 VB(12.02.2020) 2P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/