← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/19921/2015allowed

M. Manikandan v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-10-14Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fourteenth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.19921 of 2015 1 M. MANIKANDAN 2 S. CHITHAMBARAM ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 AND 4 Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE GUDALUR SOUTH POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.

IN CRIME NO. 66/2014 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S S.CHANDRASEKARAN Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.66 of 2014 on the file of the respondent Police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the 1st petitioner is the owner of a Heavy Earth Mover vehicle viz., Hitachi Excavator and for carrying some earth work, the de facto complainant engaged the 1st petitioner and gave some amount as advance. However, the 1st petitioner while demanding more money for doing the said earth work, a wordy quarrel arose and due to the same, the 1st petitioner tried to attack the de facto complainant and threatened him with dire consequences and also abused in filthy language. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely roped in this case.

4.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent Police.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam, Theni District, and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 am until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Court within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 14/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, UTHAMAPALAYAM, THENI DISTRICT.

2 -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI DISTRICT.

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE GUDALUR SOUTH POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S S.CHANDRASEKARAN Advocate SR.No.61209 Akm/16.10.2015 /2p-6c/

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.19921 of 2015 Date :14/10/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/