P.Surendhar v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Eighth day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.19891 of 2014 1 P.SURENDHAR 2 V.PANDIAN 3 PERUMAYE 4 S.DEEPA ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs.
STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, UTHAMAPALAYAM, THENI DISTRICT.
CR. NO. NOT KNWON OF 2014.
..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.PALANIVELAYUTHAM Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498(A) of I.P.C., and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.17 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused was demanded dowry of Rs.50,000/- from the de-facto complainant and also harassed her. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the defacto complainant has filed a petition in H.M.O.P.No.133 of 2013 before the Sub Court, Uthamapalayam for restitution of conjugal rights and the first accused filed a petition for divorce and after institution of the case, the de-facto complainant has lodged the complaint. He further submitted that the accused have returned the articles belonging to the de-facto complainant.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submits that the the accused have returned the articles to the de-facto complainant and the investigation is at initial stage.
5.However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.
6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, uthamapalayam, Theni District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two common sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 08/04/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, UTHAMAPALAYAM, THENI DISTRICT. 2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, UTHAMAPALAYAM, THENI DISTRICT.
+1. CC to M/S.S.PALANIVELAYUTHAM Advocate SR.No.18067 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.19891 of 2014 Date :08/04/2015 PBK/SAR-I 10/04/2015 ::2P-6C:
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/