← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/19961/2015ordered

Sakthivel v. The Insepector Of Police

2015-10-27Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Seventh day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.19961 of 2015 1 SAKTHIVEL 2 N. BALAKRISHNAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1&4 Vs THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU THE INSEPECTOR OF POLICE SATHANKULAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.480 OF 2015 ... COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S R.BALAKRISHNAN Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections153-A and 504 IPC and Section 3 of Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867 and Section 3 of PPDL Act, in Crime No.480 of 2015 on the file of the respondent Police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.According to the de facto complainant that on 09.10.2015 the accused approached the de facto complainant and the family members of a police officer to form an association for their welfare and also canvassed them to join in the Hindu Munnani organisation. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely roped in this case due to political vendetta.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent Police vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail petition contending that the accused have approached the family members of the police officers to join in a political organisation and the accused Nos.2 and 3 were arrested and remanded to judicial custody. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam, and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 am for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Court within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 27/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,SATHANKULAM.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,TUTICORIN DISTRICT. 3 THE INSEPECTOR OF POLICE, SATHANKULAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT, 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S R.BALAKRISHNAN Advocate SR.No.62620

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.19961 of 2015 Date :27/10/2015 CSL/AAL-MPA/SAR-I/29.10.2015 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/