K.Alagarsamy v. Meenakshmi Rajagopal Ias
Cont.P.(MD)No.233 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.02.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU Cont.P.(MD)No.233 of 2021 K.Alagarsamy ... Petitioner Vs.
1.Meenakshi Rajagopal, IAS The Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Panagal Building, Chennai-600 015.
2.Ravikumar, The Block Development Officer(B.D.O), Block Development Office, Virudhunagar Block, Virudhunagar District ..Respondents Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to initiate contempt proceedings under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents herein for their willful disobedience to implement the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.4422 of 2020, dated 02.03.2020 and punish the respondents.
Prayer in WP(MD). 4422/ 2020 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay the lump sum Payment a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty thousand rupees) and the Special Monthly Pension a sum of Rs.2,000/- for every month from the date of retirement ie., 30.6.2018 to the petitioner based on the Government order in G.O.Ms.No.348 (Finance (Pay Cell) Department ) dt 28/11/2017 within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Sahaya Philomin Raj For Respondents : Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah, Additional Government Pleader.
ORDER
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
Cont.P.(MD)No.233 of 2021 submit that the order of this Court in W.P.(MD)No.4422 of 2020, dated 02.03.2020, has been complied with.
2.Recording the same, this contempt petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (W) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) gns NOTE: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-6911[F] dated 24/02/2021 ) Cont.P.(MD)No.233 of 2021 sv2(CO) KK(08.03.2021) 2P 2C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2