Karthikeyan v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.02.2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Karthikeyan
...Petitioner/Sole Accused
-vsThe State represented by The Inspector of Police, Nainarkoil Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.
(in Cr.No.207 of 2022)
...Respondent/Complainant
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C, praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent Police with respect to Cr.No.207 of 2022.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Praveenkumar, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy Government Advocate (Crl.side) ****
ORDER
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(B), 324 and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.207 of 2022 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution, as per the de-facto complainant, is that on 18.12.2022, when the petitioner's wife was in her maternal home, the petitioner, who is the son-in-law of the de-facto complainant, came to the house of the de-facto complainant in an inebriated condition and snatched the child from his wife. When the same was questioned by the de-facto complainant, the petitioner has abused his wife and the de-facto complainant and bitten the de-facto complainant on his shoulder. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and due to a family dispute, a false complaint has been given against the petitioner. He would also submit that the petitioner is none other than the son-in-law of the de-facto complainant. He would also submit that he petitioner has not committed any offence, as alleged by the prosecution. He would also submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions, that may be imposed on him. Hence, he would pray for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
1/3
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that on 18.12.2022, the petitioner, who is the son-in-law of the de-facto complainant, came to the house of the de-facto complainant in an inebriated condition and snatched the child from his wife and also abused his wife and the de-facto complainant and bitten the de-facto complainant on his shoulder. He would further submit that the injured has been discharged from hospital. However, he would object for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.Taking into consideration the facts and submissions and also on perusing the materials available on record including the F.I.R., this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
sd/- 02/02/2023 / TRUE COPY / /02/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
CMR 2/3
TO
1. The Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi.
2. -Do- Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram District.
3. The Inspector of Police, Nainarkoil Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.
4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.2126 of 2023 Date :02/02/2023 VA/CG/SAR-1/09.02.2023/2P/5C 3/3