Rahdakrishnan v. The Superintendent Of Police

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2442 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.02.2022

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2442 of 2022 Radhakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2. The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch, Dindigul District.

3. Saravanan

...Respondents

Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of the enquiry based upon the third respondent complaint.

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Vinothkumar For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi No.1 to 2 Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioner on the guise of enquiry except through due process of law

2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, petition enquiry was conducted and the same was closed. The same is recorded.

3. It is made clear, now that the complaint has been closed, the respondent shall not call the petitioner in the guise of enquiry and harass him.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2442 of 2022 4.With the above observation, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD-I) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar To:

1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2. The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch, Dindigul District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2442 of 2022 07.02.2022 AAV MS/16.02.2022/2P.4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2