V. Diravidaselvan@Karuppaiah v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Sixteenth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.20121 of 2015 1 V. DIRAVIDASELVAN@KARUPPAIAH 2 VELLAISAMY 3 SEKAR 4 KALIMUTHU 5 NAGARAJ 6 CHELLAIAH 7 MUTHULEXMI 8 RAKKU 9 MARIAMMAL 10 LEXMI 11 ARUMUGAM ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 to 11 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANAMADURAI POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.
(IN CRIME NO. 621 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S R.KARUNANIDHI Advocate For Respondent : Mrs.S.Prabha Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 427, 447 IPC in Crime No.621 of 2015 on the file of the respondent Police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to boundary dispute, the accused trespassed into the property of the de facto complainant and damaged the fencing worth of Rs.50,000/-.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the accused family members and the de facto complainant are neighbouring land owners and due to boundary dispute, they have been falsely roped in this case. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent Police vehemently opposed for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two common sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 16/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAMADURAI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT 2 -DO-THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANAMADURAI POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S R.KARUNANIDHI Advocate SR.No.61991 Sm:AMF-SAR II:27.10.2015:2P/6C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.20121 of 2015 Date :16/10/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/