N.Ansar Maideen v. The Inspector Of Police
`BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.02.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.2886 of 2020 and Crl.M.P(MD)No.1538 of 2020 1.N.Ansar Maideen 2.A.Ibrahim 3.A.Feroshkhan 4.A.Najibur Rahman 5.K.Sheik Fareed 6.M.Jafar Sathique 7.N.Mohamad Ismayil 8.M.Sathique Ali 9.A.Samsudeen Sait
...Petitioners / Accused Nos.2, 7,
10, 13, 16, 19, 23, 30 and 32 Vs.
1.State through The Inspector of Police, Town North Police Station, Dindigul District.
...Respondent /Complainant
2.P.Deivam, Inspector of Police, Town North Police Station, Dindigul District.
... Respondent/De-facto Complainant PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the entire records connected with the case in C.C.No.510 of 2017, pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul and quash the same as illegal insofar as it relates to the petitioners .
For Petitioners : Mr.I.Sabeer Mohamed For Respondents : Mr.S.Chandrasekar Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.510 of 2017, pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul, for the offences under Sections 143, 188 and 341 of IPC.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the facts of the case are exactly similar to the case covered in the decision reported in 2018 2 LW (Crl) 606 [Jeevanandham and others vs. The Inspector of Police Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District] dated 20.09.2018 and in case of Sri Raja vs Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station Virudhunagar District and other in batch of cases in Crl.O.P(MD) No.7922 of 2019, dated 30.08.2019.
3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents would submit that the facts of the case are similar to the facts covered under the Judgment referred above. 4.Heard both sides and perused the materials on record 5.The facts of this case is similar to the facts covered by the Judgment of this Court reported in 2018 2 LW (Crl) 606 [Jeevanandham and others vs. The Inspector of Police Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District] dated 20.09.2018 and in case of Sri Raja vs Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station Virudhunagar District and other in batch of cases in Crl.O.P(MD) No.7922 of 2019 dated 30.08.2019. Considering the facts and submissions, the proceedings in C.C.No.510 of 2017, pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul, is hereby quashed, insofar as the petitioners are concerned and the Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) tsg To
1. The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul.
2.The Inspector of Police, Town North Police Station, Dindigul District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+1 CC to Mr.I.SABEER MOHAMED, Advocate ( SR-7613[F]dated 21/02/2020 ) Crl.O.P.(MD).No.2886 of 2020 and Crl.M.P(MD)No.1538 of 2020 19.02.2020 VB(27.02.2020) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/