Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/2019/2015ordered

Chandran v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2015-02-05Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifth day of February Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.2019 of 2015 CHANDRAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THURAIYUR POLICE STATION, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI DISTRICT.

(REF:CRIME NO.382/2015) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.D.SHANMUGARAJA SETHUPATHI Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) IPC in Crime No.382 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police, the petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submits that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and that no previous case has been registered against the petitioner and co-accused was arrested and granted anticipatory bail.

3.Considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged from hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen

(15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thuraiyur, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that, [a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent/Police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation;

[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law, as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[e] The Inspector of Police concerned is directed to send a compliance report to the Office of the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), as to whether the petitioner is complying with the order or not.

sd/- 05/02/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THURAIYUR 2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUCHIRAPPALLI DISTRICT 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THURAIYUR POLICE STATION, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.D.SHANMUGARAJA SETHUPATHI Advocate SR.No.5354

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.2019 of 2015 Date :05/02/2015 NA/06/02/2015/P2/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/