Sathishkumar v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Third day of November Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.20229 of 2015 1 SATHISHKUMAR 2 SELVAKUMAR ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED(Rank Not Known) Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
(CR.NO.596 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S A.K.MANICKAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.ANBARASAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 379 of I.P.C., in Crime No.596 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The prosecution case is that the petitioner along with the other accused viz., Vadivel have stolen the motor, starter and wire belongs to the de-facto complainant.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case and it is further submitted that as per the confession given by A1, the petitioners were implicated in this case.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the first accused was already arrested and released on bail.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the first accused was already arrested and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ enlarged on bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to
the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Natham and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 03/11/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NATHAM, DINDIGUL 2 DO THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM POLICE STATION,DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
4 THE THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S A.K.MANICKAM Advocate SR.No.64556
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.20229 of 2015 Date :03/11/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ JAM 05/11/2015/NGM-SS/SAR II/2P-6C