Guruvu @ Gurusamy v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fifteenth day of May Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr Justice B.PUGALENDHI CRL OP(MD) No.7152 of 2019 GURUVU @ GURUSAMY ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1 Vs THE STATE;- REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THALAVAIPURAM POLICE STATION, CRIME NO. 122/2019. ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.RAMAKRISHNAN, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.Robinson, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/accused no.1, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 379 of IPC and Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1959 in Crime No.122 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.Heard Mr.S.Ramakrishnan, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.A.Robinson, learned Government Advocate (Crl Side) appearing for the State.

3.The case of the prosecution is that when the respondent police conducted their routine police patrol on 11.05.2019 at about 08.30 a.m., near Puthur to Malaikovil Road, they found the petitioner along with other accused in possession of one unit of Kanmai clay in an unnumbered Mahindra Tractor. Hence, the complaint. 4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and he did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to this petitioner.

5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl Side) appearing for the respondent Police opposes the grant of anticipatory bail that the petitioner was in possession of one unit of kanmai clay. 6.Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and there is no bad antecedent against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions.

7.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District, and on further conditions that:- [a] the petitioner as well as the sureties shall submit a copy of their Aadhar card or any other identity cards issued by the Government, in proof of their address, along with the surety bonds. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m, until further orders.

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall co-operate for the investigation and the trial. The petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial and in event of the petitioner absconds, the respondent police shall register a case as provided under Section 229-A IPC.

[e] in the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate / trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner, as per the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 15/05/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S-I) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAJAPALAYAM, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT 2 -DO-THRO-THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THALAVAIPURAM POLICE STATION, 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.S. RAMAKRISHNAN Advocate SR.No.8446

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.7152 of 2019 Date :15/05/2019 ES/JC/SAR 1/22.05.2019/3P/6C