Umapathi v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Sixteenth day of November Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.20264 of 2015 UMAPATHI ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NATHAM POLICE STATION, NATHAM TALUK, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

(CR.NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONER : M/S M.GNANAGURUNATHAN ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MR.K.ANBARASAN, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 420, 463 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code and seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) on instructions submitted that based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, enquiry has been conducted and thereafter, the same has been closed.

3. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed. sd/- 16/11/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO

1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM POLICE STATION, NATHAM TALUK, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

2. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S M.GNANAGURUNATHAN Advocate SR.No. 65581 ORDER IN 1P/4C CRL OP(MD) No.20264 of 2015 TE/ARK-IK/SAR-I : 17/11/2015 Date :16/11/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/