V. Kasinathan v. The Inspector Of Police

CRL OP(MD). No.2376 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 11/02/2020 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD). No.2376 of 2020

1. V. Kasinathan,

2. K. Menaka, ... Petitioners/Accused 1&2 Vs State rep by The Inspector of Police, Dindigul Taluk Police Station, Dindigul.

(Crime No.74/2020).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s. G. Thiruvarutselvan, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.A.Robinson, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 74/2020 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

2. The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences under sections 294(b), 341, 342, 307 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.74 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

3. The defacto complainant is said to be engaged in some minor manufacturing activity. The same is considered as nuisance by the petitioner herein. This is the cause for the occurrence. The first petitioner is said to have hit the victim with iron rod on his head. The second petitioner had also assaulted him. The victim is said to have been in hospital for about five days.

4. The petitioners' counsel on instructions states that the petitioners will take a demand draft for a sum of Rs.5,000/- https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.2376 of 2020 favouring the victim and enclose the same along with the surrender petition. The Court below shall take steps to hand over the same to the victim. Of course, this will be without prejudice to the petitioners' defence in the trial.

5. Recording the said undertaking, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dindigul, and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 11/02/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I DINDIGUL 2 DO-THROUGH :

THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDUGAL DISTRICT. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DINDIGUL TALUK POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL.

+1. CC to Mr. G. THIRUVARUTSELVAN Advocate SR.No.2850

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.2376 of 2020 Date :11/02/2020 KM/(14.02.2020)SAR1/SKN/ 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2