Sivanantha Perumal v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fifteenth day of May Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr Justice B.PUGALENDHI CRL OP(MD) No.7176 of 2019 1 SIVANANTHA PERUMAL 2 RAMASAMY ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP.BY ITS, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUNELVELI TALUK POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT (CRIME NO. 148/2019) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : Mr.M.S.JEYAKARTHIK, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.Robinson, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/accused rank not known, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 379 of IPC and 4(1) and 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 in Crime No.148 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.Heard Mr.M.S.Jeyakarthik, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr.A.Robinson, learned Government Advocate (Crl Side) appearing for the State.
3.The case of the prosecution is that when the respondent police conducted vehicle checkup, they found that the petitioners have illegally transported sand without any valid permission. On seeing the law enforcing agency, the petitioners fled away from the alleged occurrence. Hence, the complaint.
4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocents and they did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. According to him, there is no bad antecedent against them and to show their bonafide, they are also prepared to deposit some amount.
5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl Side) appearing for the respondent Police opposes the grant of bail that the petitioners are involved in illegal sand mining and were in possession of three units of sand. According to him, the petitioners are also involved in two similar cases.
6.Taking into consideration of the facts and cicumstances of the case and there is no bad antecedent against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to the following conditions.
7.Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to deposit a sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand only) each, to the account of Patient Welfare Society, District Headquarters Hospital, Tirunelveli and preferably it can be utilized for the purpose of installation of UPS (inverter) in the Hospital wards depending upon the requirement within the district, on such deposit, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tirunelveli, and on further conditions that:- [a] the petitioners as well as the sureties shall submit a copy of their Aadhar card or any other identity cards issued by the Government, in proof of their address, along with the surety bonds. [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m, until further orders. [c] the petitioners shall not tamper the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[d] the petitioners shall co-operate for the investigation and the trial. The petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial and in event of the petitioners absconds, the respondent police shall register a case as provided under Section 229-A IPC.
[e] in the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate / trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners, as per the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
8.Merely, because the petitioners had deposited the said amount, it would not amount to admission of their guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently. sd/- 15/05/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S-II) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III, TIRUNELVELI 2 -DO-THRO-THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TIRUNELVELI TALUK POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,Madurai.
Copy To:
THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, PATIENT WELFARE SOCIETY, DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS HOSPITAL, TIRUNELVELI +1. CC to M/S.S.R.DURAI RAJ Advocate SR.No.8415
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.7176 of 2019 Date :15/05/2019 ES/PN/SAR 2/20.05.2019/3P/7C