Sangeeth Kumar v. The Insepector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Seventh day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.20377 of 2015 1 SANGEETH KUMAR 2 RAJA SINGH ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 1 & 2 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSEPECTOR OF POLICE RAILWAY POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL, CR.NO.86 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S S.GOKULRAJ Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.Prabha Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 and A2, in Crime No.86 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 21.08.2015, for the alleged offences punishable under Section 150(i)(a) of Indian Railway Act, and hence, seek bail. 2.According to the prosecution, on 17.08.2015, the accused placed lime stone on the railway track with an intention to derail the train. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners' name were not mentioned in the FIR and they are implicated based on the confession of the co-accused. It is further submitted that they have been incarceration for about 60 days and they are ready to abide by any condition.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) vehemently opposed granting of bail to the petitioners contending that the petitioners have committed grave offence and they are not entitled for any indulgence of this Court and it is further submitted that the petitioners have no bad antecedent.
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul and on further condition that https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
the petitioners shall reside at Thoothukudi and report before the Sipcot Police Station daily twice a day at 10.00 a.m, and 05.00 p.m., for a period of sixty days and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. sd/- 27/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.II, DINDIGUL. 2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSEPECTOR OF POLICE, RAILWAY POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL.
5 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, SIPCOT POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI. 6 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, SUB JAIL, DINDIGUL. 7 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, BORSTAL SCHOOL, MELUR. +1. CC to M/S S.GOKULRAJ Advocate SR.No. 62647. TS/27.10.2015/2P - 9C DP/SAR -I
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.20377 of 2015 Date :27/10/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/