← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/7307/2019ordered

Gopi Jeganathan v. The Inspector Of Police,

2019-05-29Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Ninth day of May Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN CRL OP(MD) No.7307 of 2019 GOPI JEGANATHAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1 Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NIB-CID, THENI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.184/2017 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR.M.VASANTHAN Advocate For Respondent : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrayed as accused No.1, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii) © and 25 of NDPS Act in Crime No.184 of 2017, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the petitioner is that he was earlier arrested and released on bail in the above case and thereby, he was attending the case regularly from the year 2018 onwards. On 11.07.2018, non-bailable warrant was issued against him, due to his non-appearance. The petitioner undertakes that he will appear before the Court in future hearings and co-operate for the trial. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person, he did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution and his name has been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor fairly conceded that before 11.07.2018, the petitioner was regularly appearing before the trial court and facing trial proceedings. Only on 11.07.2018, non-bailable warrant was issued against the petitioner for his non-appearance.

5.The submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side are considered.

6.Considering the fact that the petitioner was regularly appearing before the trial court on earlier occasions, I am of the considered opinion that it is a fit case for granting anticipatory bail.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Additional Principal Special Court for EC & NDPS Act Cases, Madurai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(i) the petitioner as well as the sureties shall submit a copy of their Aadhar card or any other Identity cards issued by the Government, in proof of their address, along with the surety bonds. ii) the petitioner shall appear before the trial court daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of three weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

(iii) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. (iv) the petitioner shall co-operate for the investigation and the trial. The petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial and in the event of the petitioner abscond, the respondent police shall register a case as provided under Section 229-A I.P.C.

(v) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner shall stand automatically cancelled and the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 29/05/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL SPECIAL COURT FOR EC & NDPS ACT CASES, MADURAI.

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NIBCID, THENI DISTRICT.

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.M.VASANTHAN, Advocate ( SR-8909[I] dated 30/05/2019 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.7307 of 2019 Date :29/05/2019 JM/VR/SAR 4/03.06.2019/3P/5C