Subramanian@Kadamuda Murugan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twentieth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.20409 of 2015 1 SUBRAMANIAN@KADAMUDA MURUGAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.2 Vs state rep.By THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALAYAMKOTTAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI TOWN,TIRUNELVELI.

(CRIME NO. 766 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S A.SIVASUBRAMANIAN Advocate For Respondent : A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 353, 307 and 506(ii) of Indian Penal Code in Crime No.766 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveil, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner shall report before the learned Magistrate concerned daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks. [b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 20/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALAYAMKOTTAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI TOWN,TIRUNELVELI.

2 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1 , TIRUNELVELI 3 DO THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI 4 THE THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S A.SIVASUBRAMANIAN Advocate SR.No.62219 JAM /20.10.2015/MP/SAR I/2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.20409 of 2015 Date :20/10/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/