← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/2708/2020dismissed as infructuous

R. Savarimuthu v. The Superintendent Of Police

2026-02-11Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan,Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.02.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA and WMP(MD)Nos.2314 to 2316 of 2020 R.Savarimuthu ... Petitioner -vs1. The Superintendent of Police Dindigul District

2. The Tahsildhar Aathur Taluk, Dindigul District

3. The Inspector of Police Chinnalapatti Police Station, Chinnalapatti, Aathur Taluk Dindigul District

4. Nagaraj

5. Muthuraj ..Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the

impugned order Na.Ka.No.2823/2016/A.2 dated 23.01.2020 on the file of the second respondent and quash the same and further direct the third respondent to provide adequate police protection for conducting the St.Anthony's festival at St.Antony's Church, Perumalkovilpatti, Dindigul District.

For Petitioner :

Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai For R1 to R3 :

Mrs.Ahamed Yashmin Parvin Government Advocate For R4 :

No appearance For R5 :

Mr.B.Rajesh Saravanan

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.] When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that the prayer sought for in this petition has become infructuous.

2. Recording the same, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions stand closed.

[G.K.I., J.] [R.P., J.] 11.02.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes / No aav To:

1. The Superintendent of Police Dindigul District

2. The Tahsildhar Aathur Taluk, Dindigul District

3. The Inspector of Police Chinnalapatti Police Station, Chinnalapatti, Aathur Taluk Dindigul District

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN , J.

and R.POORNIMA , J.

aav 11.02.2026