Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/20599/2015ordered

R. Muthumariappan v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-10-28Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.20599 of 2015 1 R. MUTHUMARIAPPAN 2 R. VIJAI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.2 & 3 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CENTRAL POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 427 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S G.THALAIMUTHARASU Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A2 and A3, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 365, 294(b), 323, 324, 387, 467, 506(ii), 120(b), 384 and 364(A) of I.P.C., in Crime No.427 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant is a goldsmith and on 02.09.2015, one Karthik Pandi contacted the de-facto complainant and demanded Rs.25 lakhs as ransom. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case and the petitioners are the brothers of the de-facto complainant and the Co-accused have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court.

4.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thoothukudi and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 28/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II,THOOTHUKUDI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,THOOTHUKUDI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CENTRAL POLICE STATION,THOOTHUKUDI,THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S G.THALAIMUTHARASU Advocate SR.No.63089

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.20599 of 2015 Date :28/10/2015 AA/GSV-PM/SAR-II/30.10.2015/2p-6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/