← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/20613/2015ordered

Palpandi v. The Insepector Of Police

2015-10-28Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.20613 of 2015 1 PALPANDI 2 RAVIKUMAR 3 CHINNAPANDI 4 RAJAMANI 5 NAVEEN ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 to 4 & 6 Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSEPECTOR OF POLICE TOWN POLICE STATION, THIRUMANAGALAM, MADURAI DISTRICT.

CR. NO.503 OF 2015 ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S P.GANAPATHI SUBRAMANIAN Advocate For Respondent : M/s.S.PRABHA, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 to A4 and A6 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324 and 307 of IPC, in Crime No.503 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, there was a wordy altercation between the accused and the de-facto complainant, in which the accused assaulted the de-facto complainant and also threatened the de-facto complainant with dire consequences. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. The learned counsel further submitted that it is a case of case and counter.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) for the respondent submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital . 5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners 1, 2, 3 and 5 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 06.00 p.m until further orders and the 4th https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 28/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI DISTRICT. 2 -do-thro'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,MADURAI. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSEPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN POLICE STATION, THIRUMANAGALAM, MADURAI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S P.GANAPATHI SUBRAMANIAN Advocate SR.No.63598 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.20613 of 2015 Date :28/10/2015 PBK/SK-SKN/SAR-I 30/10/2015 ::2P-6C::

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/