Arumuga Nadar v. The Insepector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.20626 of 2015 1 ARUMUGA NADAR 2 KAMALA 3 KAVITHA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSEPECTOR OF POLICE TALUK POLICE STATION, THIRUNEVELI DISTRICT, (CRIME NO NOT KNOWN OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S K.SIVABALAN Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 498(A) of I.P.C., and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.Heard Both sides.

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that there is neither a case registered, nor a petition enquiry is pending against the petitioners.

4.Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), this criminal Original petition is dismissed. sd/- 28/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSEPECTOR OF POLICE,TALUK POLICE STATION,THIRUNEVELI DISTRICT, 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.20626 of 2015 Date :28/10/2015 CSL/JGB/SAR-I/02.11.2015/1P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/