Rajalakshmi v. The Insepector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.20627 of 2015 RAJALAKSHMI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.7 Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSEPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, CRIME NO.33 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S S.VINAYAK Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- he petitioner, who is arrayed as A7, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 494, 498(A) and 506(i) of I.P.C., and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, in Crime No.33 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused demanded Rs.2,00,000/- as additional dowry and also harassed the de-facto complainant.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and she has been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that it is a case of matrimonial dispute and the co-accused were already released on anticipatory bail by this Court on 20.10.2015 in Crl.O.P.No.20482 of 2015.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dindigul and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 28/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1, DINDIGUL.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 3 THE INSEPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL,DINDIGUL DISTRICT, 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S S.VINAYAK Advocate SR.No. 63309

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.20627 of 2015 Date :28/10/2015 CSL/AAL-MPA/SAR-I/29.10.2015 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/