Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/20628/2015allowed

Soundarapandi v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-10-28Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.20628 of 2015 1 SOUNDARAPANDI 2 KOTTAIYAN 3 PANDI 4 RAJA 5 JEEVA 6 KANDAN 7 SONAI 8 SATHIS 9 KARUPPAIAH ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 to 9 Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUMANGALAM TALUK POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. 268 OF 2015 ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S G.MURUGESAN Advocate For Respondent : M/s.S.PRABHA, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 to A9, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b) and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.268 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to dispute over celebrating temple festival, the accused have abused and threatened the de-facto complainant.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence and A1 and A2 are having one previous case each.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, Madurai District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 28/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI DISTRICT. 2 -do-thro' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,MADURAI. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUMANGALAM TALUK POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S G.MURUGESAN Advocate SR.No.63252 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.20628 of 2015 Date :28/10/2015 PBK/SK-SKN/SAR-I 30/10/2015 ::2P-6C::

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/