Pandi v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.20742 of 2015 1 PANDI 2 SOLAIYAMMAL 3 GANESAN 4 SUMATHI .. PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO. RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARUPPUKOTTAI TOWN POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2015 .. RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S N.RANJITH Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) on instructions would submit that the Petitioners are not accused in Crime No.715 of 2015, on the file of the respondent Police as on date and it is further submitted that the son of the first accused has kidnapped the victim girl. 2.The statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) is recorded and hence, the Criminal Original petition stands dismissed.

sd/- 29/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARUPPUKOTTAI TOWN POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.20742 of 2015 Date :29/10/2015 GJM/SK/3.11.2015-2P-3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/