Gnana Sigamani v. The Inspetor Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 06/06/2019 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM CRL OP(MD). No.7710 of 2019 1.Gnana Sigamani 2.Victor 3.Jenith ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3 Vs The State rep.by The Inspetor of Police, Anjugramam Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

Crime No.154/2019.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners: M/s.A.Sivasubramanian, Advocate. For Respondent : Mrs.M.Anantha Devi, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side).

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 Cr.P.C ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294 (b), 323 and 506 (i) of IPC in Crime No.154 of 2019, seek anticipatory bail.

2. Heard both sides.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has submitted that it is a case and case in counter. Due to previous enmity between the first petitioner and the defacto complainant, a false case has been foisted against the petitioners. The defacto complainant has sustained only simple injuries and he was already discharged from the hospital and hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent has submitted that defacto complainant has sustained simple injuries and he was already discharged from the hospital. However, she opposed this petition as investigation is still pending.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Taking into consideration of the fact that the injured person sustained only simple injuries and also discharged from the

hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.III, Nagercoil on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (i) If the petitioners fail to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days, this order shall stand automatically cancelled.

(ii) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of three weeks and thereafter, as and when required before the respondent police for interrogation. (iii) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

(iv) the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

(v) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. (vi) If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 06/06/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III, NAGERCOIL.

2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL.

3. THE INSPETOR OF POLICE, ANJUGRAMAM POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.A.SIVASUBRAMANIAN, Advocate SR.No.9268 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.7710 of 2019 Date :06/06/2019 MS/VR/SAR-3/11.06.2019/2P.6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/