Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/2620/2020allowed

Ravichandran v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-02-19Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.02.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.2620 of 2020 and Crl.M.P.(MD) Nos. 1368 & 1369 of 2020

1. Ravichandran

2. Venkatachalam

3. Anbuselvam

4. Tamilselvan

5. Senthilkumar

6. Ramesh

7. Elaiyaraja

8. Kumar

9. Chinnappan

10. Dhanalakshmi

...Petitioners/A1 to A10

Vs.

1. State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Siruganur Police Station, Trichy District.

(Crime No. 223 of 2017).

...R-1/Complainant

2. Gopalakrishnan ... R-2/Defacto complainant PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records pertaining in C.C. No. 64 of 2019 in connection with Crime No.223 of 2017 for the offences under Sections 143 & 188 of IPC on the file of the first respondent is pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Lalkudi and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioners : Mr.S. Vanchinathan For R1 : Mrs.S.Bharathi Government Advocate (crl. Side)

O R D E R

The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 64 of 2019 in connection with Crime No.223 of 2017 for the offences under Sections 143 & 188 of IPC on the file of the first respondent is pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Lalkudi as against the petitioners. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the facts of the case are exactly similar to the case covered in the decision reported in 2018 2 LW (Crl) 606 [Jeevanandham and others vs. The Inspector of Police https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District] dated 20.09.2018 and in case of Sri Raja vs Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station Virudhunagar District and other in batch of cases in Crl.O.P(MD) No.7922 of 2019 dated 30.08.2019

3. The learned Government Advocate (crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the facts of the case are similar to the facts covered under the Judgment referred above. 4.Heard both sides and perused the materials on record 5.The facts of this case is similar to the facts covered by the Judgment of this Court reported in 2018 2 LW (Crl) 606 [Jeevanandham and others vs. The Inspector of Police Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District] dated 20.09.2018 and in case of Sri Raja vs Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station Virudhunagar District and other in batch of cases in Crl.O.P(MD) No.7922 of 2019 dated 30.08.2019.

6. Considering the facts and submissions, the proceedings in C.C. No. 64 of 2019 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Lalkudi in connection with Crime No.223 of 2017 for the offences under Sections 143 & 188 of IPC on the file of the first respondent is hereby quashed as against the petitioners concerned and the Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Records) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ksa To

1. The Inspector of Police, Siruganur Police Station, Trichy District.

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to Mr.S.VANCHINATHAN, Advocate ( SR-7222[F] dated 20/02/2020 ) Crl.O.P.(MD).No.2620 of 2020 19.02.2020 VB(11.03.2020) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/