Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/20847/2015ordered

Rafiq Mohammed v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-10-30Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Thirtieth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.20847 of 2015 1 RAFIQ MOHAMMED 2 KANI 3 TAMIL ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 to 3 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE BAZAAR POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 341 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S D.BALAMURUGAPANDI Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 to A3, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.341 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to family dispute between the petitioners and the de-facto complainant, the petitioners abused her and also beaten her and caused injuries.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the injured had been discharged from the hospital and it is a case and case in counter.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District, and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 30/10/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1 RAMANATHAPURAM 2 DO THRO THE CHEIF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE BAZAAR POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI +1. CC to M/S D.BALAMURUGAPANDI Advocate SR.No.63937.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.20847 of 2015 Date :30/10/2015 AM/02.11.2015/GSV.PM/SAR-1/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/