Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/20819/2014allowed

Thangaduraichi v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-07-06Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Sixth day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.20819 of 2014 1 THANGADURAICHI 2 MURUGALAKSHMI 3 VELUTHAYEE 4 SENTHOORPANDIAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2 TO 5 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THENKASI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.27 OF 2014 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.MURUGAPPAN Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, in Crime No.27 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 406, 498(A) and 506(i) IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.According to the defacto complainant, the accused have demanded dowry and harassed her.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are in-laws of the defacto complainant and they are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the respondent police and the first accused was arrested and released on bail.

4.Heard the learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ for the State.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Senkottai, and on each of them executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction to the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 06/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SENKOTTAI.

2 DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THENKASI,TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.R.MURUGAPPAN Advocate SR.No.36441

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.20819 of 2014 Date :06/07/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ PA/IV/08.07.2015/2P/6C