K.Karthikeyan v. The State Rep. By, The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.02.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL W.P(MD)No.3163 of 2025 K.Karthikeyan ... Petitioner Vs

1. The State represented by, The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent of Police, Theni District, Theni.

2. The Inspector of Police, Palani Chetti Patti Police Station, Theni District, Theni.

3. Ajik Arabukani,

4. Yoga Shree, Executive Officer, B.Meenatchipuram Town Panchayat, Bodinaickanur, Theni District ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.10.2024 and take appropriate action against the 3rd and 4th respondents. Page No. 1 of 4

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ranjith For Respondents :

For R1 & R2 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side)

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representation dated 07.10.2024 and to take appropriate action as against the 3rd and 4th respondents and to pass further orders.

2. Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal Side) takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2. Since the prayer is only for limited purpose, this Court dispense with the issuance of notice to the 3rd and 4th respondents.

3. According to the petitioner, he submitted a representation dated 07.10.2024 to take appropriate action against the 3rd and 4th respondent and the same has not been considered by the official respondents 1 and 2.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal Side) Page No. 2 of 4

appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the representation of the petitioner dated 07.10.2024 was already considered and the petition was closed. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication.

5. Considering the above said submissions that already the representation of the petitioner dated 07.10.2024 was considered and the same was closed. Preserving the petitioner's liberty to challenge the said order passed by the 2nd respondent, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

04.02.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No mac To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent of Police, Theni District, Theni.

2. The Inspector of Police, Palani Chetti Patti Police Station, Theni District, Theni.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Page No. 3 of 4

P.DHANABAL , J.

mac W.P(MD)No.3163 of 2025 04.02.2025 Page No. 4 of 4