Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/2101/2015disposed of

Surliappan v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-02-06Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Sixth day of February Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.2101 of 2015 1 SURLIAPPAN 2 MAHALAKSHMI 3 DEVI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RAK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHINNAMANOOR POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.63 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.B. JEYAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.63 of 2015, on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 294(b), 341, 448, 323 and 506(i) of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners are now before this Court seeking Anticipatory Bail.

2. It is the case of the prosecution that due to wordy quarrel, these petitioners have attacked the de-facto complainant and threatened.

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners.

3.It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) that there is no serious injury and there is no previous case as against the petitioners. Under such circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with conditions.

4. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthammapalayam, Theni District, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that, (a) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. sd/- 06/02/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE UTHAMAPALAYAM THENI DISTRICT 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THENI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHINNAMANOOR POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S.B. JEYAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.6066 RL/6 C- 11/2/2015

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.2101 of 2015 Date :06/02/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/