Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/20950/2014dismissed

P.Prabaharan v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-03-02Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Second day of March Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) Nos.20950 and 22244 of 2014 P.PRABAHARAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN CRL OP(MD)NO.20950/2014 SELVAKANI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1 CRL OP(MD)NO.22244/2014 APPADUARI ...INTERVENER IN CRL OP(MD)NO.20950/2014 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING - II, TIRUNELVELI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

(*)CRIME NO.7 OF 2014 (respectively) Amended as per the order of this Hon'ble court dated 02.12.2014 and made in MP(md)No.2 of 2014 in Crl.OP(md)No.20950/2014 ... RESPONDENTS / COMPLAINANTS IN BOTH THE CASES.

For Petitioner : M/S. R. ANAND Advocate, IN THE BOTH THE CASES. For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

IN THE BOTH THE CASES.

For Intervenor : MR.KPS.MANIMOZHI GIDEON,ADVOCATE PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.7 of 2014, on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 420 IPC, the petitioners are now before this Court seeking Anticipatory Bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned counsel for the intervenor and the learned Government Advocate for the respondent.

3. Initially, these petitions were referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre and a failure report dated 23.02.2015 has been received from the Mediation Centre.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioners herein had started an unregistered chit in the name of "Ilaignar Kuzhu Narpani

Mandram" ([nisqh; FG ew;gzp kd;wk;) and were doing unauthorised chit business. According to the de-facto complainant, a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- is due.

5. The respondent police has filed a counter affidavit, in which, they have stated that they have received about 20 complaints and a total amount that has been defrauded comes to around Rs.18 lakhs. In view of the serious nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail and hence, these petitions are dismissed.

sd/- 02/03/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING - II, TIRUNELVELI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

2.THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1cc to MR.KPS.MANIMOZHI GIDEON, ADVOCATE IN SR NO.9963

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) Nos.20950 and 22244 of 2014 Date :02/03/2015 rg.06.03.2015 2p.4c.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/