Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8038/2019dismissed

Gowtham v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2019-06-17Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Seventeenth day of June Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM CRL OP(MD) No.8038 of 2019 N.GOWTHAMAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.24 Vs STATE REP. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DINDIGUL TOWN WEST POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.4/2019 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR.A.K.AZAGARSAMI Advocate For Respondent : MR.V.NEELAKANDAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A 24, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 302 and 109 IPC, in Crime No.4 of 2019, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused unlawfully assembled and murdered the defacto complainant's husband viz., Arul Samy. Hence the respondent police registered a case against the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that based on the confession of A9, a false case has been foisted against the petitioner and he has nothing to do with the alleged offence, and hence, he prayed anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that this petition is third anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner. He further submitted that the investigation is at the preliminary stage and there is no change in facts and circumstances of the case and he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact there is no change in facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Hence the anticipatory bail petition is dismissed. sd/- 17/06/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DINDIGUL TOWN WEST POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8038 of 2019 Date :17/06/2019 JM/VR/SAR 4/27.06.2019/2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/