← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/21131/2015ordered

Murugan v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-11-04Honourable Ms.Justice V.M.Velumani2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fourth day of November Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.21131 of 2015 MURUGAN ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARUNGAL POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 601 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S A.THIRUVADI KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.ANBARASAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(i) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, in Crime No.601 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.

3.It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that the injured person had already been discharged from the hospital.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured person had already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Principal District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

5. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 04/11/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT MUNSIF-CUM JUDICIAL MAGIATATE, ERANIEL

2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KANYAKUMARI AT NAGARCOIL

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KARUNGAL POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

4. THE THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S A.THIRUVADI KUMAR Advocate SR.No.64830

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.21131 of 2015 Date :04/11/2015 GJM/NGM/SS/SARII-5.11.2015-2P-6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/