S. Chinnarajmeeran v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifth day of November Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.21271 of 2015 S. CHINNARAJMEERAN ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, CR NO.594 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S D.SELVARAJ Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.Anbarasan, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/sole accused apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294 (b), 323 and 506(i) IPC in Crime No.594 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is intercepted the Executive Officer of the Panchayat while removing the encroachment. 3.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent person and he has not committed any offence and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner. 4.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side). 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that no one sustained injury, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Natham and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.

10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 05/11/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NATHAM 2 -do-thro THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S D.SELVARAJ Advocate SR.No.65097 sm:KBM:SAR II:06.11.2015:2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.21271 of 2015 Date :05/11/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/