← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8349/2019ordered

Gowndar @ Sathiyamoorthy v. The Inspector Of Police

2019-06-17Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 17/06/2019 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM CRL OP(MD). No.8349 of 2019

1. Gowndar @ Sathiyamoorthy

2. Kesavan @ Kesavamoorthy ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 3 - VsState Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Swamimalai Police Station, Thanjavur District (Cr.No.141/2019).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners: M/s.A.Thiruvadi Kumar, Advocate. For Respondent : Mrs.M.Anantha Devi, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side).

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory bail in Cr.No.141/2019 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294 (b), 324 and 506 (2) IPC, in Crime No.141 of 2019, seek anticipatory bail.

2. Heard both sides.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that as per the FIR, due to previous enmity, wordy quarrel arose between the petitioners and the defacto complainant. the petitioners assaulted the defacto complainant with iron rod and criminally intimidated him. The defacto complainant sustained only simple injuries and he was already discharged from the hospital and hence, he prayed anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent has submitted that the petitioners have assaulted the defacto complainant with iron rod. Hence, she opposed this petition. However, she fairly conceded that no previous case is pending against the petitioner and the defacto complainant sustained only simple injuries and he was also discharged from the hospital. 5.Taking into consideration of the fact that the defacto complainant sustained only simple injuries and he was also discharged from the hospital and also the fact that no previous case is pending against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.II, Kumbakonam, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (i) If the petitioners fail to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days, this order shall stand automatically cancelled.

(ii) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of three weeks and thereafter, as and when required before the respondent police for interrogation. (iii) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

(iv) the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

(v) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. (vi) If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 17/06/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, KUMBAKONAM.

2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR DISTRICT AT KUMBAKONAM.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SWAMIMALAI POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.A.THIRUVADI KUMAR Advocate SR.No.9852

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8349 of 2019 Date :17/06/2019 MS/VR/SAR-4/21.06.2019/3P.6C